blob: 0894700a3100287068bbdf66d048c68b1d9575df [file] [log] [blame]
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +01001/** Mutex usage verification framework. */
2
3/*
4 * Copyright The Mbed TLS Contributors
Dave Rodgman16799db2023-11-02 19:47:20 +00005 * SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR GPL-2.0-or-later
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +01006 */
7
8#include <test/helpers.h>
9#include <test/macros.h>
10
11#if defined(MBEDTLS_TEST_MUTEX_USAGE)
12
13#include "mbedtls/threading.h"
14
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +010015/** Mutex usage verification framework.
16 *
17 * The mutex usage verification code below aims to detect bad usage of
18 * Mbed TLS's mutex abstraction layer at runtime. Note that this is solely
19 * about the use of the mutex itself, not about checking whether the mutex
20 * correctly protects whatever it is supposed to protect.
21 *
22 * The normal usage of a mutex is:
23 * ```
24 * digraph mutex_states {
25 * "UNINITIALIZED"; // the initial state
26 * "IDLE";
27 * "FREED";
28 * "LOCKED";
29 * "UNINITIALIZED" -> "IDLE" [label="init"];
30 * "FREED" -> "IDLE" [label="init"];
31 * "IDLE" -> "LOCKED" [label="lock"];
32 * "LOCKED" -> "IDLE" [label="unlock"];
33 * "IDLE" -> "FREED" [label="free"];
34 * }
35 * ```
36 *
37 * All bad transitions that can be unambiguously detected are reported.
38 * An attempt to use an uninitialized mutex cannot be detected in general
39 * since the memory content may happen to denote a valid state. For the same
40 * reason, a double init cannot be detected.
41 * All-bits-zero is the state of a freed mutex, which is distinct from an
42 * initialized mutex, so attempting to use zero-initialized memory as a mutex
43 * without calling the init function is detected.
44 *
Gilles Peskinef96d3d82021-01-29 22:20:32 +010045 * The framework attempts to detect missing calls to init and free by counting
46 * calls to init and free. If there are more calls to init than free, this
47 * means that a mutex is not being freed somewhere, which is a memory leak
48 * on platforms where a mutex consumes resources other than the
49 * mbedtls_threading_mutex_t object itself. If there are more calls to free
50 * than init, this indicates a missing init, which is likely to be detected
51 * by an attempt to lock the mutex as well. A limitation of this framework is
52 * that it cannot detect scenarios where there is exactly the same number of
53 * calls to init and free but the calls don't match. A bug like this is
54 * unlikely to happen uniformly throughout the whole test suite though.
55 *
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +010056 * If an error is detected, this framework will report what happened and the
57 * test case will be marked as failed. Unfortunately, the error report cannot
58 * indicate the exact location of the problematic call. To locate the error,
59 * use a debugger and set a breakpoint on mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error().
60 */
Paul Elliott9e259362023-11-15 11:33:32 +000061enum value_of_mutex_state_field {
62 /* Potential values for the state field of mbedtls_threading_mutex_t.
Gilles Peskine39a1a262021-02-09 15:35:29 +010063 * Note that MUTEX_FREED must be 0 and MUTEX_IDLE must be 1 for
64 * compatibility with threading_mutex_init_pthread() and
65 * threading_mutex_free_pthread(). MUTEX_LOCKED could be any nonzero
66 * value. */
Paul Elliott5fa986c2023-11-10 14:05:09 +000067 MUTEX_FREED = 0, //! < Set by mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_free
68 MUTEX_IDLE = 1, //! < Set by mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_init and by mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_unlock
69 MUTEX_LOCKED = 2, //! < Set by mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_lock
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +010070};
71
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +010072typedef struct {
73 void (*init)(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *);
74 void (*free)(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *);
75 int (*lock)(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *);
76 int (*unlock)(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *);
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +010077} mutex_functions_t;
78static mutex_functions_t mutex_functions;
79
Paul Elliott392ed3f2023-11-24 15:48:28 +000080/**
81 * The mutex used to guard live_mutexes below and access to the status variable
82 * in every mbedtls_threading_mutex_t.
83 * Note that we are not reporting any errors when locking and unlocking this
84 * mutex. This is for a couple of reasons:
85 *
86 * 1. We have no real way of reporting any errors with this mutex - we cannot
87 * report it back to the caller, as the failure was not that of the mutex
88 * passed in. We could fail the test, but again this would indicate a problem
89 * with the test code that did not exist.
90 *
91 * 2. Any failure to lock is unlikely to be intermittent, and will thus not
92 * give false test results - the overall result would be to turn off the
93 * testing. This is not a situation that is likely to happen with normal
94 * testing and we still have TSan to fall back on should this happen.
95 */
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +000096mbedtls_threading_mutex_t mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex;
97
Paul Elliott392ed3f2023-11-24 15:48:28 +000098/**
99 * The total number of calls to mbedtls_mutex_init(), minus the total number
100 * of calls to mbedtls_mutex_free().
Gilles Peskinef96d3d82021-01-29 22:20:32 +0100101 *
Paul Elliott392ed3f2023-11-24 15:48:28 +0000102 * Do not read or write without holding mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex (above). Reset
103 * to 0 after each test case.
Gilles Peskinef96d3d82021-01-29 22:20:32 +0100104 */
105static int live_mutexes;
106
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100107static void mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *mutex,
108 const char *msg)
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100109{
110 (void) mutex;
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000111
Paul Elliott4580d4d2023-10-27 18:41:02 +0100112 mbedtls_test_set_mutex_usage_error(msg);
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100113 mbedtls_fprintf(stdout, "[mutex: %s] ", msg);
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100114 /* Don't mark the test as failed yet. This way, if the test fails later
115 * for a functional reason, the test framework will report the message
116 * and location for this functional reason. If the test passes,
117 * mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_check() will mark it as failed. */
118}
119
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000120extern mbedtls_threading_mutex_t mbedtls_test_info_mutex;
121
122static int mbedtls_test_mutex_can_test(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *mutex)
123{
124 /* If we attempt to run tests on this mutex then we are going to run into a
125 * couple of problems:
126 * 1. If any test on this mutex fails, we are going to deadlock when
127 * reporting that failure, as we already hold the mutex at that point.
128 * 2. Given the 'global' position of the initialization and free of this
129 * mutex, it will be shown as leaked on the first test run. */
130 if (mutex == &mbedtls_test_info_mutex) {
131 return 0;
132 }
133
134 return 1;
135}
136
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100137static void mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_init(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *mutex)
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100138{
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100139 mutex_functions.init(mutex);
Paul Elliott5fa986c2023-11-10 14:05:09 +0000140
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000141 if (mbedtls_test_mutex_can_test(mutex)) {
142 if (mutex_functions.lock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex) == 0) {
143 mutex->state = MUTEX_IDLE;
144 ++live_mutexes;
Paul Elliott5fa986c2023-11-10 14:05:09 +0000145
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000146 mutex_functions.unlock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex);
147 }
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100148 }
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100149}
150
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100151static void mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_free(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *mutex)
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100152{
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000153 if (mbedtls_test_mutex_can_test(mutex)) {
154 if (mutex_functions.lock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex) == 0) {
Paul Elliott5fa986c2023-11-10 14:05:09 +0000155
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000156 switch (mutex->state) {
157 case MUTEX_FREED:
158 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "free without init or double free");
159 break;
160 case MUTEX_IDLE:
161 mutex->state = MUTEX_FREED;
162 --live_mutexes;
163 break;
164 case MUTEX_LOCKED:
165 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "free without unlock");
166 break;
167 default:
168 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "corrupted state");
169 break;
170 }
171
172 mutex_functions.unlock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex);
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000173 }
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100174 }
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000175
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100176 mutex_functions.free(mutex);
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100177}
178
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100179static int mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_lock(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *mutex)
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100180{
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000181 /* Lock the passed in mutex first, so that the only way to change the state
182 * is to hold the passed in and internal mutex - otherwise we create a race
183 * condition. */
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100184 int ret = mutex_functions.lock(mutex);
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000185
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000186 if (mbedtls_test_mutex_can_test(mutex)) {
187 if (mutex_functions.lock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex) == 0) {
188 switch (mutex->state) {
189 case MUTEX_FREED:
190 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "lock without init");
191 break;
192 case MUTEX_IDLE:
193 if (ret == 0) {
194 mutex->state = MUTEX_LOCKED;
195 }
196 break;
197 case MUTEX_LOCKED:
198 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "double lock");
199 break;
200 default:
201 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "corrupted state");
202 break;
203 }
204
205 mutex_functions.unlock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex);
206 }
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100207 }
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000208
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100209 return ret;
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100210}
211
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100212static int mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_unlock(mbedtls_threading_mutex_t *mutex)
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100213{
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000214 /* Lock the internal mutex first and change state, so that the only way to
215 * change the state is to hold the passed in and internal mutex - otherwise
216 * we create a race condition. */
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000217 if (mbedtls_test_mutex_can_test(mutex)) {
218 if (mutex_functions.lock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex) == 0) {
219 switch (mutex->state) {
220 case MUTEX_FREED:
221 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "unlock without init");
222 break;
223 case MUTEX_IDLE:
224 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "unlock without lock");
225 break;
226 case MUTEX_LOCKED:
227 mutex->state = MUTEX_IDLE;
228 break;
229 default:
230 mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_error(mutex, "corrupted state");
231 break;
232 }
233 mutex_functions.unlock(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex);
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000234 }
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100235 }
Paul Elliott0710ac42024-01-09 17:20:58 +0000236
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000237 return mutex_functions.unlock(mutex);
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100238}
239
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100240void mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_init(void)
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100241{
242 mutex_functions.init = mbedtls_mutex_init;
243 mutex_functions.free = mbedtls_mutex_free;
244 mutex_functions.lock = mbedtls_mutex_lock;
245 mutex_functions.unlock = mbedtls_mutex_unlock;
246 mbedtls_mutex_init = &mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_init;
247 mbedtls_mutex_free = &mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_free;
248 mbedtls_mutex_lock = &mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_lock;
249 mbedtls_mutex_unlock = &mbedtls_test_wrap_mutex_unlock;
Paul Elliott37746372023-11-12 19:05:57 +0000250
251 mutex_functions.init(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex);
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100252}
253
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100254void mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_check(void)
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100255{
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100256 if (live_mutexes != 0) {
Gilles Peskinef96d3d82021-01-29 22:20:32 +0100257 /* A positive number (more init than free) means that a mutex resource
258 * is leaking (on platforms where a mutex consumes more than the
259 * mbedtls_threading_mutex_t object itself). The rare case of a
260 * negative number means a missing init somewhere. */
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100261 mbedtls_fprintf(stdout, "[mutex: %d leaked] ", live_mutexes);
Gilles Peskinef96d3d82021-01-29 22:20:32 +0100262 live_mutexes = 0;
Paul Elliott4580d4d2023-10-27 18:41:02 +0100263 mbedtls_test_set_mutex_usage_error("missing free");
Gilles Peskinef96d3d82021-01-29 22:20:32 +0100264 }
Paul Elliott4580d4d2023-10-27 18:41:02 +0100265 if (mbedtls_test_get_mutex_usage_error() != NULL &&
266 mbedtls_test_get_result() != MBEDTLS_TEST_RESULT_FAILED) {
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100267 /* Functionally, the test passed. But there was a mutex usage error,
268 * so mark the test as failed after all. */
Gilles Peskine449bd832023-01-11 14:50:10 +0100269 mbedtls_test_fail("Mutex usage error", __LINE__, __FILE__);
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100270 }
Paul Elliott4580d4d2023-10-27 18:41:02 +0100271 mbedtls_test_set_mutex_usage_error(NULL);
Gilles Peskine2a4c5982021-01-29 21:18:09 +0100272}
273
Paul Elliottf25d8312023-11-23 18:49:43 +0000274void mbedtls_test_mutex_usage_end(void)
275{
276 mbedtls_mutex_init = mutex_functions.init;
277 mbedtls_mutex_free = mutex_functions.free;
278 mbedtls_mutex_lock = mutex_functions.lock;
279 mbedtls_mutex_unlock = mutex_functions.unlock;
280
281 mutex_functions.free(&mbedtls_test_mutex_mutex);
282}
283
Gilles Peskine1061ec62021-01-29 21:17:11 +0100284#endif /* MBEDTLS_TEST_MUTEX_USAGE */