blob: 0dc710691893a8432eaaae9f65d54ba8600919f1 [file] [log] [blame]
shiqiane35fdd92008-12-10 05:08:54 +00001// Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
2// All rights reserved.
3//
4// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
5// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
6// met:
7//
8// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
9// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
10// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
11// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
12// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
13// distribution.
14// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
15// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
16// this software without specific prior written permission.
17//
18// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
19// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
20// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
21// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
22// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
23// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
24// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
25// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
26// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
27// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
28// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
29//
30// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
31
32#include <gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h>
33
34#include <string>
35#include <gmock/gmock.h>
36#include <gtest/gtest.h>
37#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
38
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +000039// This must not be defined inside the ::testing namespace, or it will
40// clash with ::testing::Mock.
41class Mock {
42 public:
43 MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, void());
44};
45
shiqiane35fdd92008-12-10 05:08:54 +000046namespace testing {
47namespace gmock_nice_strict_test {
48
49using testing::internal::string;
50using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
51using testing::HasSubstr;
52using testing::NiceMock;
53using testing::StrictMock;
54
55// Defines some mock classes needed by the tests.
56
57class Foo {
58 public:
59 virtual ~Foo() {}
60
61 virtual void DoThis() = 0;
62 virtual int DoThat(bool flag) = 0;
63};
64
65class MockFoo : public Foo {
66 public:
67 void Delete() { delete this; }
68
69 MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, void());
70 MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, int(bool flag));
71};
72
73class MockBar {
74 public:
75 explicit MockBar(const string& s) : str_(s) {}
76
77 MockBar(char a1, char a2, string a3, string a4, int a5, int a6,
78 const string& a7, const string& a8, bool a9, bool a10) {
79 str_ = string() + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + static_cast<char>(a5) +
80 static_cast<char>(a6) + a7 + a8 + (a9 ? 'T' : 'F') + (a10 ? 'T' : 'F');
81 }
82
83 virtual ~MockBar() {}
84
85 const string& str() const { return str_; }
86
87 MOCK_METHOD0(This, int());
88 MOCK_METHOD2(That, string(int, bool));
89
90 private:
91 string str_;
92};
93
94// TODO(wan@google.com): find a way to re-enable these tests.
95#if 0
96
97// Tests that a nice mock generates no warning for uninteresting calls.
98TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCall) {
99 NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
100
101 CaptureTestStdout();
102 nice_foo.DoThis();
103 nice_foo.DoThat(true);
104 EXPECT_EQ("", GetCapturedTestStdout());
105}
106
107// Tests that a nice mock generates no warning for uninteresting calls
108// that delete the mock object.
109TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) {
110 NiceMock<MockFoo>* const nice_foo = new NiceMock<MockFoo>;
111
112 ON_CALL(*nice_foo, DoThis())
113 .WillByDefault(Invoke(nice_foo, &MockFoo::Delete));
114
115 CaptureTestStdout();
116 nice_foo->DoThis();
117 EXPECT_EQ("", GetCapturedTestStdout());
118}
119
120// Tests that a nice mock generates informational logs for
121// uninteresting calls.
122TEST(NiceMockTest, InfoForUninterestingCall) {
123 NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
124
125 GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info";
126 CaptureTestStdout();
127 nice_foo.DoThis();
128 EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedTestStdout(),
129 HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call"));
130
131 CaptureTestStdout();
132 nice_foo.DoThat(true);
133 EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedTestStdout(),
134 HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call"));
135}
136
137#endif // 0
138
139// Tests that a nice mock allows expected calls.
140TEST(NiceMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) {
141 NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
142
143 EXPECT_CALL(nice_foo, DoThis());
144 nice_foo.DoThis();
145}
146
147// Tests that an unexpected call on a nice mock fails.
148TEST(NiceMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) {
149 NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
150
151 EXPECT_CALL(nice_foo, DoThis()).Times(0);
152 EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(nice_foo.DoThis(), "called more times than expected");
153}
154
155// Tests that NiceMock works with a mock class that has a non-default
156// constructor.
157TEST(NiceMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor) {
158 NiceMock<MockBar> nice_bar("hi");
159 EXPECT_EQ("hi", nice_bar.str());
160
161 nice_bar.This();
162 nice_bar.That(5, true);
163}
164
165// Tests that NiceMock works with a mock class that has a 10-ary
166// non-default constructor.
167TEST(NiceMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) {
168 NiceMock<MockBar> nice_bar('a', 'b', "c", "d", 'e', 'f',
169 "g", "h", true, false);
170 EXPECT_EQ("abcdefghTF", nice_bar.str());
171
172 nice_bar.This();
173 nice_bar.That(5, true);
174}
175
zhanyong.wan93244dc2009-09-17 19:11:00 +0000176#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +0000177// Tests that NiceMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
178// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to workaround an
179// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of
180// NiceMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test
181// ensures that our fix works.
zhanyong.wan93244dc2009-09-17 19:11:00 +0000182//
183// We have to skip this test on Symbian, as it causes the program to
184// crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet.
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +0000185TEST(NiceMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
186 NiceMock< ::Mock> nice;
187 EXPECT_CALL(nice, DoThis());
188 nice.DoThis();
189}
zhanyong.wan93244dc2009-09-17 19:11:00 +0000190#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +0000191
shiqiane35fdd92008-12-10 05:08:54 +0000192// Tests that a strict mock allows expected calls.
193TEST(StrictMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) {
194 StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
195
196 EXPECT_CALL(strict_foo, DoThis());
197 strict_foo.DoThis();
198}
199
200// Tests that an unexpected call on a strict mock fails.
201TEST(StrictMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) {
202 StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
203
204 EXPECT_CALL(strict_foo, DoThis()).Times(0);
205 EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo.DoThis(),
206 "called more times than expected");
207}
208
209// Tests that an uninteresting call on a strict mock fails.
210TEST(StrictMockTest, UninterestingCallFails) {
211 StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
212
213 EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo.DoThis(),
214 "Uninteresting mock function call");
215}
216
217// Tests that an uninteresting call on a strict mock fails, even if
218// the call deletes the mock object.
219TEST(StrictMockTest, UninterestingCallFailsAfterDeath) {
220 StrictMock<MockFoo>* const strict_foo = new StrictMock<MockFoo>;
221
222 ON_CALL(*strict_foo, DoThis())
223 .WillByDefault(Invoke(strict_foo, &MockFoo::Delete));
224
225 EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo->DoThis(),
226 "Uninteresting mock function call");
227}
228
229// Tests that StrictMock works with a mock class that has a
230// non-default constructor.
231TEST(StrictMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor) {
232 StrictMock<MockBar> strict_bar("hi");
233 EXPECT_EQ("hi", strict_bar.str());
234
235 EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_bar.That(5, true),
236 "Uninteresting mock function call");
237}
238
239// Tests that StrictMock works with a mock class that has a 10-ary
240// non-default constructor.
241TEST(StrictMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) {
242 StrictMock<MockBar> strict_bar('a', 'b', "c", "d", 'e', 'f',
243 "g", "h", true, false);
244 EXPECT_EQ("abcdefghTF", strict_bar.str());
245
246 EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_bar.That(5, true),
247 "Uninteresting mock function call");
248}
249
zhanyong.wan93244dc2009-09-17 19:11:00 +0000250#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +0000251// Tests that StrictMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
252// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to workaround an
253// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of
254// StrictMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test
255// ensures that our fix works.
zhanyong.wan93244dc2009-09-17 19:11:00 +0000256//
257// We have to skip this test on Symbian, as it causes the program to
258// crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet.
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +0000259TEST(StrictMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
zhanyong.wan93244dc2009-09-17 19:11:00 +0000260 StrictMock< ::Mock> strict;
261 EXPECT_CALL(strict, DoThis());
262 strict.DoThis();
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +0000263}
zhanyong.wan93244dc2009-09-17 19:11:00 +0000264#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
zhanyong.wan4bd79e42009-09-16 17:38:08 +0000265
shiqiane35fdd92008-12-10 05:08:54 +0000266} // namespace gmock_nice_strict_test
267} // namespace testing