v4.19.13 snapshot.
diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1e1c023
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * linux/kernel/capability.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 1997 Andrew Main <zefram@fysh.org>
+ *
+ * Integrated into 2.1.97+, Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
+ * 30 May 2002: Cleanup, Robert M. Love <rml@tech9.net>
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/audit.h>
+#include <linux/capability.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/security.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
+#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+
+/*
+ * Leveraged for setting/resetting capabilities
+ */
+
+const kernel_cap_t __cap_empty_set = CAP_EMPTY_SET;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cap_empty_set);
+
+int file_caps_enabled = 1;
+
+static int __init file_caps_disable(char *str)
+{
+ file_caps_enabled = 0;
+ return 1;
+}
+__setup("no_file_caps", file_caps_disable);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MULTIUSER
+/*
+ * More recent versions of libcap are available from:
+ *
+ * http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/
+ */
+
+static void warn_legacy_capability_use(void)
+{
+ char name[sizeof(current->comm)];
+
+ pr_info_once("warning: `%s' uses 32-bit capabilities (legacy support in use)\n",
+ get_task_comm(name, current));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Version 2 capabilities worked fine, but the linux/capability.h file
+ * that accompanied their introduction encouraged their use without
+ * the necessary user-space source code changes. As such, we have
+ * created a version 3 with equivalent functionality to version 2, but
+ * with a header change to protect legacy source code from using
+ * version 2 when it wanted to use version 1. If your system has code
+ * that trips the following warning, it is using version 2 specific
+ * capabilities and may be doing so insecurely.
+ *
+ * The remedy is to either upgrade your version of libcap (to 2.10+,
+ * if the application is linked against it), or recompile your
+ * application with modern kernel headers and this warning will go
+ * away.
+ */
+
+static void warn_deprecated_v2(void)
+{
+ char name[sizeof(current->comm)];
+
+ pr_info_once("warning: `%s' uses deprecated v2 capabilities in a way that may be insecure\n",
+ get_task_comm(name, current));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Version check. Return the number of u32s in each capability flag
+ * array, or a negative value on error.
+ */
+static int cap_validate_magic(cap_user_header_t header, unsigned *tocopy)
+{
+ __u32 version;
+
+ if (get_user(version, &header->version))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ switch (version) {
+ case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_1:
+ warn_legacy_capability_use();
+ *tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_1;
+ break;
+ case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_2:
+ warn_deprecated_v2();
+ /*
+ * fall through - v3 is otherwise equivalent to v2.
+ */
+ case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3:
+ *tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_3;
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (put_user((u32)_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_VERSION, &header->version))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The only thing that can change the capabilities of the current
+ * process is the current process. As such, we can't be in this code
+ * at the same time as we are in the process of setting capabilities
+ * in this process. The net result is that we can limit our use of
+ * locks to when we are reading the caps of another process.
+ */
+static inline int cap_get_target_pid(pid_t pid, kernel_cap_t *pEp,
+ kernel_cap_t *pIp, kernel_cap_t *pPp)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (pid && (pid != task_pid_vnr(current))) {
+ struct task_struct *target;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ target = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
+ if (!target)
+ ret = -ESRCH;
+ else
+ ret = security_capget(target, pEp, pIp, pPp);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ } else
+ ret = security_capget(current, pEp, pIp, pPp);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * sys_capget - get the capabilities of a given process.
+ * @header: pointer to struct that contains capability version and
+ * target pid data
+ * @dataptr: pointer to struct that contains the effective, permitted,
+ * and inheritable capabilities that are returned
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success and < 0 on error.
+ */
+SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capget, cap_user_header_t, header, cap_user_data_t, dataptr)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ pid_t pid;
+ unsigned tocopy;
+ kernel_cap_t pE, pI, pP;
+
+ ret = cap_validate_magic(header, &tocopy);
+ if ((dataptr == NULL) || (ret != 0))
+ return ((dataptr == NULL) && (ret == -EINVAL)) ? 0 : ret;
+
+ if (get_user(pid, &header->pid))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (pid < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = cap_get_target_pid(pid, &pE, &pI, &pP);
+ if (!ret) {
+ struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
+ unsigned i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < tocopy; i++) {
+ kdata[i].effective = pE.cap[i];
+ kdata[i].permitted = pP.cap[i];
+ kdata[i].inheritable = pI.cap[i];
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Note, in the case, tocopy < _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S,
+ * we silently drop the upper capabilities here. This
+ * has the effect of making older libcap
+ * implementations implicitly drop upper capability
+ * bits when they perform a: capget/modify/capset
+ * sequence.
+ *
+ * This behavior is considered fail-safe
+ * behavior. Upgrading the application to a newer
+ * version of libcap will enable access to the newer
+ * capabilities.
+ *
+ * An alternative would be to return an error here
+ * (-ERANGE), but that causes legacy applications to
+ * unexpectedly fail; the capget/modify/capset aborts
+ * before modification is attempted and the application
+ * fails.
+ */
+ if (copy_to_user(dataptr, kdata, tocopy
+ * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct))) {
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * sys_capset - set capabilities for a process or (*) a group of processes
+ * @header: pointer to struct that contains capability version and
+ * target pid data
+ * @data: pointer to struct that contains the effective, permitted,
+ * and inheritable capabilities
+ *
+ * Set capabilities for the current process only. The ability to any other
+ * process(es) has been deprecated and removed.
+ *
+ * The restrictions on setting capabilities are specified as:
+ *
+ * I: any raised capabilities must be a subset of the old permitted
+ * P: any raised capabilities must be a subset of the old permitted
+ * E: must be set to a subset of new permitted
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success and < 0 on error.
+ */
+SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset, cap_user_header_t, header, const cap_user_data_t, data)
+{
+ struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
+ unsigned i, tocopy, copybytes;
+ kernel_cap_t inheritable, permitted, effective;
+ struct cred *new;
+ int ret;
+ pid_t pid;
+
+ ret = cap_validate_magic(header, &tocopy);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (get_user(pid, &header->pid))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ /* may only affect current now */
+ if (pid != 0 && pid != task_pid_vnr(current))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ copybytes = tocopy * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct);
+ if (copybytes > sizeof(kdata))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&kdata, data, copybytes))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < tocopy; i++) {
+ effective.cap[i] = kdata[i].effective;
+ permitted.cap[i] = kdata[i].permitted;
+ inheritable.cap[i] = kdata[i].inheritable;
+ }
+ while (i < _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S) {
+ effective.cap[i] = 0;
+ permitted.cap[i] = 0;
+ inheritable.cap[i] = 0;
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ effective.cap[CAP_LAST_U32] &= CAP_LAST_U32_VALID_MASK;
+ permitted.cap[CAP_LAST_U32] &= CAP_LAST_U32_VALID_MASK;
+ inheritable.cap[CAP_LAST_U32] &= CAP_LAST_U32_VALID_MASK;
+
+ new = prepare_creds();
+ if (!new)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = security_capset(new, current_cred(),
+ &effective, &inheritable, &permitted);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto error;
+
+ audit_log_capset(new, current_cred());
+
+ return commit_creds(new);
+
+error:
+ abort_creds(new);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * has_ns_capability - Does a task have a capability in a specific user ns
+ * @t: The task in question
+ * @ns: target user namespace
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
+ * currently in effect to the specified user namespace, false if not.
+ *
+ * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
+ */
+bool has_ns_capability(struct task_struct *t,
+ struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ret = security_capable(__task_cred(t), ns, cap);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return (ret == 0);
+}
+
+/**
+ * has_capability - Does a task have a capability in init_user_ns
+ * @t: The task in question
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
+ * currently in effect to the initial user namespace, false if not.
+ *
+ * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
+ */
+bool has_capability(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
+{
+ return has_ns_capability(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(has_capability);
+
+/**
+ * has_ns_capability_noaudit - Does a task have a capability (unaudited)
+ * in a specific user ns.
+ * @t: The task in question
+ * @ns: target user namespace
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
+ * currently in effect to the specified user namespace, false if not.
+ * Do not write an audit message for the check.
+ *
+ * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
+ */
+bool has_ns_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t,
+ struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ret = security_capable_noaudit(__task_cred(t), ns, cap);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return (ret == 0);
+}
+
+/**
+ * has_capability_noaudit - Does a task have a capability (unaudited) in the
+ * initial user ns
+ * @t: The task in question
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
+ * currently in effect to init_user_ns, false if not. Don't write an
+ * audit message for the check.
+ *
+ * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
+ */
+bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
+{
+ return has_ns_capability_noaudit(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
+}
+
+static bool ns_capable_common(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap, bool audit)
+{
+ int capable;
+
+ if (unlikely(!cap_valid(cap))) {
+ pr_crit("capable() called with invalid cap=%u\n", cap);
+ BUG();
+ }
+
+ capable = audit ? security_capable(current_cred(), ns, cap) :
+ security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(), ns, cap);
+ if (capable == 0) {
+ current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/**
+ * ns_capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
+ * @ns: The usernamespace we want the capability in
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
+ * available for use, false if not.
+ *
+ * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
+ * assumption that it's about to be used.
+ */
+bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+{
+ return ns_capable_common(ns, cap, true);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable);
+
+/**
+ * ns_capable_noaudit - Determine if the current task has a superior capability
+ * (unaudited) in effect
+ * @ns: The usernamespace we want the capability in
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
+ * available for use, false if not.
+ *
+ * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
+ * assumption that it's about to be used.
+ */
+bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+{
+ return ns_capable_common(ns, cap, false);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable_noaudit);
+
+/**
+ * capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
+ * available for use, false if not.
+ *
+ * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
+ * assumption that it's about to be used.
+ */
+bool capable(int cap)
+{
+ return ns_capable(&init_user_ns, cap);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
+#endif /* CONFIG_MULTIUSER */
+
+/**
+ * file_ns_capable - Determine if the file's opener had a capability in effect
+ * @file: The file we want to check
+ * @ns: The usernamespace we want the capability in
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if task that opened the file had a capability in effect
+ * when the file was opened.
+ *
+ * This does not set PF_SUPERPRIV because the caller may not
+ * actually be privileged.
+ */
+bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *file, struct user_namespace *ns,
+ int cap)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cap_valid(cap)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (security_capable(file->f_cred, ns, cap) == 0)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_ns_capable);
+
+/**
+ * privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid - Do capabilities in the namespace work over the inode?
+ * @ns: The user namespace in question
+ * @inode: The inode in question
+ *
+ * Return true if the inode uid and gid are within the namespace.
+ */
+bool privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(struct user_namespace *ns, const struct inode *inode)
+{
+ return kuid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_uid) &&
+ kgid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_gid);
+}
+
+/**
+ * capable_wrt_inode_uidgid - Check nsown_capable and uid and gid mapped
+ * @inode: The inode in question
+ * @cap: The capability in question
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given capability targeted at
+ * its own user namespace and that the given inode's uid and gid are
+ * mapped into the current user namespace.
+ */
+bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const struct inode *inode, int cap)
+{
+ struct user_namespace *ns = current_user_ns();
+
+ return ns_capable(ns, cap) && privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(ns, inode);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable_wrt_inode_uidgid);
+
+/**
+ * ptracer_capable - Determine if the ptracer holds CAP_SYS_PTRACE in the namespace
+ * @tsk: The task that may be ptraced
+ * @ns: The user namespace to search for CAP_SYS_PTRACE in
+ *
+ * Return true if the task that is ptracing the current task had CAP_SYS_PTRACE
+ * in the specified user namespace.
+ */
+bool ptracer_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns)
+{
+ int ret = 0; /* An absent tracer adds no restrictions */
+ const struct cred *cred;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ cred = rcu_dereference(tsk->ptracer_cred);
+ if (cred)
+ ret = security_capable_noaudit(cred, ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return (ret == 0);
+}