v4.19.13 snapshot.
diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..73e06e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/swait.h
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _LINUX_SWAIT_H
+#define _LINUX_SWAIT_H
+
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/stddef.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <asm/current.h>
+
+/*
+ * BROKEN wait-queues.
+ *
+ * These "simple" wait-queues are broken garbage, and should never be
+ * used. The comments below claim that they are "similar" to regular
+ * wait-queues, but the semantics are actually completely different, and
+ * every single user we have ever had has been buggy (or pointless).
+ *
+ * A "swake_up_one()" only wakes up _one_ waiter, which is not at all what
+ * "wake_up()" does, and has led to problems. In other cases, it has
+ * been fine, because there's only ever one waiter (kvm), but in that
+ * case gthe whole "simple" wait-queue is just pointless to begin with,
+ * since there is no "queue". Use "wake_up_process()" with a direct
+ * pointer instead.
+ *
+ * While these are very similar to regular wait queues (wait.h) the most
+ * important difference is that the simple waitqueue allows for deterministic
+ * behaviour -- IOW it has strictly bounded IRQ and lock hold times.
+ *
+ * Mainly, this is accomplished by two things. Firstly not allowing swake_up_all
+ * from IRQ disabled, and dropping the lock upon every wakeup, giving a higher
+ * priority task a chance to run.
+ *
+ * Secondly, we had to drop a fair number of features of the other waitqueue
+ * code; notably:
+ *
+ * - mixing INTERRUPTIBLE and UNINTERRUPTIBLE sleeps on the same waitqueue;
+ * all wakeups are TASK_NORMAL in order to avoid O(n) lookups for the right
+ * sleeper state.
+ *
+ * - the !exclusive mode; because that leads to O(n) wakeups, everything is
+ * exclusive.
+ *
+ * - custom wake callback functions; because you cannot give any guarantees
+ * about random code. This also allows swait to be used in RT, such that
+ * raw spinlock can be used for the swait queue head.
+ *
+ * As a side effect of these; the data structures are slimmer albeit more ad-hoc.
+ * For all the above, note that simple wait queues should _only_ be used under
+ * very specific realtime constraints -- it is best to stick with the regular
+ * wait queues in most cases.
+ */
+
+struct task_struct;
+
+struct swait_queue_head {
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
+ struct list_head task_list;
+};
+
+struct swait_queue {
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct list_head task_list;
+};
+
+#define __SWAITQUEUE_INITIALIZER(name) { \
+ .task = current, \
+ .task_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).task_list), \
+}
+
+#define DECLARE_SWAITQUEUE(name) \
+ struct swait_queue name = __SWAITQUEUE_INITIALIZER(name)
+
+#define __SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name) { \
+ .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
+ .task_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).task_list), \
+}
+
+#define DECLARE_SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(name) \
+ struct swait_queue_head name = __SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name)
+
+extern void __init_swait_queue_head(struct swait_queue_head *q, const char *name,
+ struct lock_class_key *key);
+
+#define init_swait_queue_head(q) \
+ do { \
+ static struct lock_class_key __key; \
+ __init_swait_queue_head((q), #q, &__key); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+# define __SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) \
+ ({ init_swait_queue_head(&name); name; })
+# define DECLARE_SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(name) \
+ struct swait_queue_head name = __SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name)
+#else
+# define DECLARE_SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(name) \
+ DECLARE_SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(name)
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * swait_active -- locklessly test for waiters on the queue
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to test for waiters
+ *
+ * returns true if the wait list is not empty
+ *
+ * NOTE: this function is lockless and requires care, incorrect usage _will_
+ * lead to sporadic and non-obvious failure.
+ *
+ * NOTE2: this function has the same above implications as regular waitqueues.
+ *
+ * Use either while holding swait_queue_head::lock or when used for wakeups
+ * with an extra smp_mb() like:
+ *
+ * CPU0 - waker CPU1 - waiter
+ *
+ * for (;;) {
+ * @cond = true; prepare_to_swait_exclusive(&wq_head, &wait, state);
+ * smp_mb(); // smp_mb() from set_current_state()
+ * if (swait_active(wq_head)) if (@cond)
+ * wake_up(wq_head); break;
+ * schedule();
+ * }
+ * finish_swait(&wq_head, &wait);
+ *
+ * Because without the explicit smp_mb() it's possible for the
+ * swait_active() load to get hoisted over the @cond store such that we'll
+ * observe an empty wait list while the waiter might not observe @cond.
+ * This, in turn, can trigger missing wakeups.
+ *
+ * Also note that this 'optimization' trades a spin_lock() for an smp_mb(),
+ * which (when the lock is uncontended) are of roughly equal cost.
+ */
+static inline int swait_active(struct swait_queue_head *wq)
+{
+ return !list_empty(&wq->task_list);
+}
+
+/**
+ * swq_has_sleeper - check if there are any waiting processes
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to test for waiters
+ *
+ * Returns true if @wq has waiting processes
+ *
+ * Please refer to the comment for swait_active.
+ */
+static inline bool swq_has_sleeper(struct swait_queue_head *wq)
+{
+ /*
+ * We need to be sure we are in sync with the list_add()
+ * modifications to the wait queue (task_list).
+ *
+ * This memory barrier should be paired with one on the
+ * waiting side.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ return swait_active(wq);
+}
+
+extern void swake_up_one(struct swait_queue_head *q);
+extern void swake_up_all(struct swait_queue_head *q);
+extern void swake_up_locked(struct swait_queue_head *q);
+
+extern void prepare_to_swait_exclusive(struct swait_queue_head *q, struct swait_queue *wait, int state);
+extern long prepare_to_swait_event(struct swait_queue_head *q, struct swait_queue *wait, int state);
+
+extern void __finish_swait(struct swait_queue_head *q, struct swait_queue *wait);
+extern void finish_swait(struct swait_queue_head *q, struct swait_queue *wait);
+
+/* as per ___wait_event() but for swait, therefore "exclusive == 1" */
+#define ___swait_event(wq, condition, state, ret, cmd) \
+({ \
+ __label__ __out; \
+ struct swait_queue __wait; \
+ long __ret = ret; \
+ \
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&__wait.task_list); \
+ for (;;) { \
+ long __int = prepare_to_swait_event(&wq, &__wait, state);\
+ \
+ if (condition) \
+ break; \
+ \
+ if (___wait_is_interruptible(state) && __int) { \
+ __ret = __int; \
+ goto __out; \
+ } \
+ \
+ cmd; \
+ } \
+ finish_swait(&wq, &__wait); \
+__out: __ret; \
+})
+
+#define __swait_event(wq, condition) \
+ (void)___swait_event(wq, condition, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, \
+ schedule())
+
+#define swait_event_exclusive(wq, condition) \
+do { \
+ if (condition) \
+ break; \
+ __swait_event(wq, condition); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define __swait_event_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
+ ___swait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, \
+ __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret))
+
+#define swait_event_timeout_exclusive(wq, condition, timeout) \
+({ \
+ long __ret = timeout; \
+ if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \
+ __ret = __swait_event_timeout(wq, condition, timeout); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
+#define __swait_event_interruptible(wq, condition) \
+ ___swait_event(wq, condition, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, \
+ schedule())
+
+#define swait_event_interruptible_exclusive(wq, condition) \
+({ \
+ int __ret = 0; \
+ if (!(condition)) \
+ __ret = __swait_event_interruptible(wq, condition); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
+#define __swait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
+ ___swait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
+ TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, \
+ __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret))
+
+#define swait_event_interruptible_timeout_exclusive(wq, condition, timeout)\
+({ \
+ long __ret = timeout; \
+ if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \
+ __ret = __swait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, \
+ condition, timeout); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
+#define __swait_event_idle(wq, condition) \
+ (void)___swait_event(wq, condition, TASK_IDLE, 0, schedule())
+
+/**
+ * swait_event_idle_exclusive - wait without system load contribution
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to wait on
+ * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for
+ *
+ * The process is put to sleep (TASK_IDLE) until the @condition evaluates to
+ * true. The @condition is checked each time the waitqueue @wq is woken up.
+ *
+ * This function is mostly used when a kthread or workqueue waits for some
+ * condition and doesn't want to contribute to system load. Signals are
+ * ignored.
+ */
+#define swait_event_idle_exclusive(wq, condition) \
+do { \
+ if (condition) \
+ break; \
+ __swait_event_idle(wq, condition); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define __swait_event_idle_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
+ ___swait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
+ TASK_IDLE, timeout, \
+ __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret))
+
+/**
+ * swait_event_idle_timeout_exclusive - wait up to timeout without load contribution
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to wait on
+ * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for
+ * @timeout: timeout at which we'll give up in jiffies
+ *
+ * The process is put to sleep (TASK_IDLE) until the @condition evaluates to
+ * true. The @condition is checked each time the waitqueue @wq is woken up.
+ *
+ * This function is mostly used when a kthread or workqueue waits for some
+ * condition and doesn't want to contribute to system load. Signals are
+ * ignored.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 if the @condition evaluated to %false after the @timeout elapsed,
+ * 1 if the @condition evaluated to %true after the @timeout elapsed,
+ * or the remaining jiffies (at least 1) if the @condition evaluated
+ * to %true before the @timeout elapsed.
+ */
+#define swait_event_idle_timeout_exclusive(wq, condition, timeout) \
+({ \
+ long __ret = timeout; \
+ if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \
+ __ret = __swait_event_idle_timeout(wq, \
+ condition, timeout); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_SWAIT_H */