Update Linux to v5.10.157

Sourced from [1]

[1] https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.10.157.tar.xz

Signed-off-by: Olivier Deprez <olivier.deprez@arm.com>
Change-Id: I7b30d9e98d8c465d6b44de8e7433b4a40b3289ba
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 1d9262a..779b774 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -995,7 +995,6 @@
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (btrfs_is_free_space_inode(inode)) {
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
@@ -4023,6 +4022,13 @@
 			   dest->root_key.objectid);
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
+	if (atomic_read(&dest->nr_swapfiles)) {
+		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
+		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
+			   "attempt to delete subvolume %llu with active swapfile",
+			   root->root_key.objectid);
+		return -EPERM;
+	}
 	root_flags = btrfs_root_flags(&dest->root_item);
 	btrfs_set_root_flags(&dest->root_item,
 			     root_flags | BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
@@ -7474,7 +7480,19 @@
 	if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_COMPRESSED, &em->flags) ||
 	    em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE) {
 		free_extent_map(em);
-		ret = -ENOTBLK;
+		/*
+		 * If we are in a NOWAIT context, return -EAGAIN in order to
+		 * fallback to buffered IO. This is not only because we can
+		 * block with buffered IO (no support for NOWAIT semantics at
+		 * the moment) but also to avoid returning short reads to user
+		 * space - this happens if we were able to read some data from
+		 * previous non-compressed extents and then when we fallback to
+		 * buffered IO, at btrfs_file_read_iter() by calling
+		 * filemap_read(), we fail to fault in pages for the read buffer,
+		 * in which case filemap_read() returns a short read (the number
+		 * of bytes previously read is > 0, so it does not return -EFAULT).
+		 */
+		ret = (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT) ? -EAGAIN : -ENOTBLK;
 		goto unlock_err;
 	}
 
@@ -10215,8 +10233,23 @@
 	 * set. We use this counter to prevent snapshots. We must increment it
 	 * before walking the extents because we don't want a concurrent
 	 * snapshot to run after we've already checked the extents.
+	 *
+	 * It is possible that subvolume is marked for deletion but still not
+	 * removed yet. To prevent this race, we check the root status before
+	 * activating the swapfile.
 	 */
+	spin_lock(&root->root_item_lock);
+	if (btrfs_root_dead(root)) {
+		spin_unlock(&root->root_item_lock);
+
+		btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
+		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
+		"cannot activate swapfile because subvolume %llu is being deleted",
+			root->root_key.objectid);
+		return -EPERM;
+	}
 	atomic_inc(&root->nr_swapfiles);
+	spin_unlock(&root->root_item_lock);
 
 	isize = ALIGN_DOWN(inode->i_size, fs_info->sectorsize);