Update Linux to v5.10.109
Sourced from [1]
[1] https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.10.109.tar.xz
Change-Id: I19bca9fc6762d4e63bcf3e4cba88bbe560d9c76c
Signed-off-by: Olivier Deprez <olivier.deprez@arm.com>
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index 2f76d4a..33a5897 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
COMP(branch_stack->nr);
+ COMP(branch_stack->hw_idx);
for (i = 0; i < s1->branch_stack->nr; i++)
MCOMP(branch_stack->entries[i]);
}
@@ -150,6 +151,18 @@
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
COMP(phys_addr);
+ if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP)
+ COMP(cgroup);
+
+ if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_AUX) {
+ COMP(aux_sample.size);
+ if (memcmp(s1->aux_sample.data, s2->aux_sample.data,
+ s1->aux_sample.size)) {
+ pr_debug("Samples differ at 'aux_sample'\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
return true;
}
@@ -177,11 +190,12 @@
u64 data[64];
} branch_stack = {
/* 1 branch_entry */
- .data = {1, 211, 212, 213},
+ .data = {1, -1ULL, 211, 212, 213},
};
u64 regs[64];
const u32 raw_data[] = {0x12345678, 0x0a0b0c0d, 0x11020304, 0x05060708, 0 };
const u64 data[] = {0x2211443366558877ULL, 0, 0xaabbccddeeff4321ULL};
+ const u64 aux_data[] = {0xa55a, 0, 0xeeddee, 0x0282028202820282};
struct perf_sample sample = {
.ip = 101,
.pid = 102,
@@ -198,6 +212,7 @@
.transaction = 112,
.raw_data = (void *)raw_data,
.callchain = &callchain.callchain,
+ .no_hw_idx = false,
.branch_stack = &branch_stack.branch_stack,
.user_regs = {
.abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64,
@@ -218,6 +233,11 @@
.regs = regs,
},
.phys_addr = 113,
+ .cgroup = 114,
+ .aux_sample = {
+ .size = sizeof(aux_data),
+ .data = (void *)aux_data,
+ },
};
struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},};
struct perf_sample sample_out;
@@ -230,6 +250,9 @@
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR)
evsel.core.attr.sample_regs_intr = sample_regs;
+ if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK)
+ evsel.core.attr.branch_sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
+
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(regs); i++)
*(i + (u8 *)regs) = i & 0xfe;
@@ -273,12 +296,12 @@
goto out_free;
}
- evsel.sample_size = __perf_evsel__sample_size(sample_type);
+ evsel.sample_size = __evsel__sample_size(sample_type);
- err = perf_evsel__parse_sample(&evsel, event, &sample_out);
+ err = evsel__parse_sample(&evsel, event, &sample_out);
if (err) {
pr_debug("%s failed for sample_type %#"PRIx64", error %d\n",
- "perf_evsel__parse_sample", sample_type, err);
+ "evsel__parse_sample", sample_type, err);
goto out_free;
}
@@ -317,7 +340,7 @@
* were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change
* the condition below.
*/
- if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) {
+ if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP << 1) {
pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
return -1;
}