Update Linux to v5.10.109

Sourced from [1]

[1] https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.10.109.tar.xz

Change-Id: I19bca9fc6762d4e63bcf3e4cba88bbe560d9c76c
Signed-off-by: Olivier Deprez <olivier.deprez@arm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index a389fa8..e7a7c49 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 /*
  * in-kernel handling for sie intercepts
  *
- * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008, 2014
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008, 2020
  *
  *    Author(s): Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
  *               Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/pagemap.h>
 
-#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <asm/sysinfo.h>
+#include <asm/uv.h>
 
 #include "kvm-s390.h"
 #include "gaccess.h"
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@
 			return rc;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * no need to check the return value of vcpu_stop as it can only have
+	 * an error for protvirt, but protvirt means user cpu state
+	 */
 	if (!kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(vcpu->kvm))
 		kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(vcpu);
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -231,6 +235,13 @@
 
 	vcpu->stat.exit_program_interruption++;
 
+	/*
+	 * Intercept 8 indicates a loop of specification exceptions
+	 * for protected guests.
+	 */
+	if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if (guestdbg_enabled(vcpu) && per_event(vcpu)) {
 		rc = kvm_s390_handle_per_event(vcpu);
 		if (rc)
@@ -384,7 +395,7 @@
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (addr & ~PAGE_MASK)
+	if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu) && (addr & ~PAGE_MASK))
 		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
 
 	sctns = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -395,10 +406,15 @@
 
 out:
 	if (!cc) {
-		r = write_guest(vcpu, addr, reg2, sctns, PAGE_SIZE);
-		if (r) {
-			free_page((unsigned long)sctns);
-			return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, r);
+		if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)) {
+			memcpy((void *)(sida_origin(vcpu->arch.sie_block)),
+			       sctns, PAGE_SIZE);
+		} else {
+			r = write_guest(vcpu, addr, reg2, sctns, PAGE_SIZE);
+			if (r) {
+				free_page((unsigned long)sctns);
+				return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, r);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -444,6 +460,77 @@
 	return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
 }
 
+static int handle_pv_spx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	u32 pref = *(u32 *)vcpu->arch.sie_block->sidad;
+
+	kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, pref);
+	trace_kvm_s390_handle_prefix(vcpu, 1, pref);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int handle_pv_sclp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int;
+
+	spin_lock(&fi->lock);
+	/*
+	 * 2 cases:
+	 * a: an sccb answering interrupt was already pending or in flight.
+	 *    As the sccb value is not known we can simply set some value to
+	 *    trigger delivery of a saved SCCB. UV will then use its saved
+	 *    copy of the SCCB value.
+	 * b: an error SCCB interrupt needs to be injected so we also inject
+	 *    a fake SCCB address. Firmware will use the proper one.
+	 * This makes sure, that both errors and real sccb returns will only
+	 * be delivered after a notification intercept (instruction has
+	 * finished) but not after others.
+	 */
+	fi->srv_signal.ext_params |= 0x43000;
+	set_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs);
+	clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->masked_irqs);
+	spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int handle_pv_uvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct uv_cb_share *guest_uvcb = (void *)vcpu->arch.sie_block->sidad;
+	struct uv_cb_cts uvcb = {
+		.header.cmd	= UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED,
+		.header.len	= sizeof(uvcb),
+		.guest_handle	= kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(vcpu->kvm),
+		.gaddr		= guest_uvcb->paddr,
+	};
+	int rc;
+
+	if (guest_uvcb->header.cmd != UVC_CMD_REMOVE_SHARED_ACCESS) {
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "Unexpected notification intercept for UVC 0x%x\n",
+			  guest_uvcb->header.cmd);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	rc = gmap_make_secure(vcpu->arch.gmap, uvcb.gaddr, &uvcb);
+	/*
+	 * If the unpin did not succeed, the guest will exit again for the UVC
+	 * and we will retry the unpin.
+	 */
+	if (rc == -EINVAL)
+		return 0;
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static int handle_pv_notification(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa == 0xb210)
+		return handle_pv_spx(vcpu);
+	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa == 0xb220)
+		return handle_pv_sclp(vcpu);
+	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa == 0xb9a4)
+		return handle_pv_uvc(vcpu);
+
+	return handle_instruction(vcpu);
+}
+
 int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int rc, per_rc = 0;
@@ -480,6 +567,28 @@
 	case ICPT_KSS:
 		rc = kvm_s390_skey_check_enable(vcpu);
 		break;
+	case ICPT_MCHKREQ:
+	case ICPT_INT_ENABLE:
+		/*
+		 * PSW bit 13 or a CR (0, 6, 14) changed and we might
+		 * now be able to deliver interrupts. The pre-run code
+		 * will take care of this.
+		 */
+		rc = 0;
+		break;
+	case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
+		rc = handle_instruction(vcpu);
+		break;
+	case ICPT_PV_NOTIFY:
+		rc = handle_pv_notification(vcpu);
+		break;
+	case ICPT_PV_PREF:
+		rc = 0;
+		gmap_convert_to_secure(vcpu->arch.gmap,
+				       kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu));
+		gmap_convert_to_secure(vcpu->arch.gmap,
+				       kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu) + PAGE_SIZE);
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}