Update Linux to v5.10.109
Sourced from [1]
[1] https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.10.109.tar.xz
Change-Id: I19bca9fc6762d4e63bcf3e4cba88bbe560d9c76c
Signed-off-by: Olivier Deprez <olivier.deprez@arm.com>
diff --git a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
index 1c3a840..a3ecb23 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
to a somewhat opaque API.
- If you're just exposing runtime system information, a new node in sysfs
- (see ``Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt``) or the ``/proc`` filesystem may
+ (see ``Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst``) or the ``/proc`` filesystem may
be more appropriate. However, access to these mechanisms requires that the
relevant filesystem is mounted, which might not always be the case (e.g.
in a namespaced/sandboxed/chrooted environment). Avoid adding any API to
@@ -541,9 +541,9 @@
:manpage:`syscall(2)` man-page:
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/syscall.2.html#NOTES
- Collated emails from Linus Torvalds discussing the problems with ``ioctl()``:
- http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/ioctl.html
+ https://yarchive.net/comp/linux/ioctl.html
- "How to not invent kernel interfaces", Arnd Bergmann,
- http://www.ukuug.org/events/linux2007/2007/papers/Bergmann.pdf
+ https://www.ukuug.org/events/linux2007/2007/papers/Bergmann.pdf
- LWN article from Michael Kerrisk on avoiding new uses of CAP_SYS_ADMIN:
https://lwn.net/Articles/486306/
- Recommendation from Andrew Morton that all related information for a new