Update Linux to v5.4.148
Sourced from [1]
[1] https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.4.148.tar.gz
Change-Id: Ib3d26c5ba9b022e2e03533005c4fed4d7c30b61b
Signed-off-by: Olivier Deprez <olivier.deprez@arm.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
index e330e7d..896db1a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
@@ -40,29 +40,10 @@
* check if there is pending interrupt from
* non-APIC source without intack.
*/
-static int kvm_cpu_has_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
-{
- u8 accept = kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(v);
-
- if (accept) {
- if (irqchip_split(v->kvm))
- return pending_userspace_extint(v);
- else
- return v->kvm->arch.vpic->output;
- } else
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * check if there is injectable interrupt:
- * when virtual interrupt delivery enabled,
- * interrupt from apic will handled by hardware,
- * we don't need to check it here.
- */
-int kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
+int kvm_cpu_has_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
{
/*
- * FIXME: interrupt.injected represents an interrupt that it's
+ * FIXME: interrupt.injected represents an interrupt whose
* side-effects have already been applied (e.g. bit from IRR
* already moved to ISR). Therefore, it is incorrect to rely
* on interrupt.injected to know if there is a pending
@@ -75,6 +56,23 @@
if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
return v->arch.interrupt.injected;
+ if (!kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(v))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (irqchip_split(v->kvm))
+ return pending_userspace_extint(v);
+ else
+ return v->kvm->arch.vpic->output;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check if there is injectable interrupt:
+ * when virtual interrupt delivery enabled,
+ * interrupt from apic will handled by hardware,
+ * we don't need to check it here.
+ */
+int kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
+{
if (kvm_cpu_has_extint(v))
return 1;
@@ -90,20 +88,6 @@
*/
int kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
{
- /*
- * FIXME: interrupt.injected represents an interrupt that it's
- * side-effects have already been applied (e.g. bit from IRR
- * already moved to ISR). Therefore, it is incorrect to rely
- * on interrupt.injected to know if there is a pending
- * interrupt in the user-mode LAPIC.
- * This leads to nVMX/nSVM not be able to distinguish
- * if it should exit from L2 to L1 on EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT on
- * pending interrupt or should re-inject an injected
- * interrupt.
- */
- if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
- return v->arch.interrupt.injected;
-
if (kvm_cpu_has_extint(v))
return 1;
@@ -117,16 +101,21 @@
*/
static int kvm_cpu_get_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
{
- if (kvm_cpu_has_extint(v)) {
- if (irqchip_split(v->kvm)) {
- int vector = v->arch.pending_external_vector;
-
- v->arch.pending_external_vector = -1;
- return vector;
- } else
- return kvm_pic_read_irq(v->kvm); /* PIC */
- } else
+ if (!kvm_cpu_has_extint(v)) {
+ WARN_ON(!lapic_in_kernel(v));
return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
+ return v->arch.interrupt.nr;
+
+ if (irqchip_split(v->kvm)) {
+ int vector = v->arch.pending_external_vector;
+
+ v->arch.pending_external_vector = -1;
+ return vector;
+ } else
+ return kvm_pic_read_irq(v->kvm); /* PIC */
}
/*
@@ -134,13 +123,7 @@
*/
int kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
{
- int vector;
-
- if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
- return v->arch.interrupt.nr;
-
- vector = kvm_cpu_get_extint(v);
-
+ int vector = kvm_cpu_get_extint(v);
if (vector != -1)
return vector; /* PIC */